On Violence, Threats and Recourse: A Moral Inquiry
How imminent threats blur the line between legal and moral responses
How imminent threats blur the line between legal and moral responses
there is no such thing as a true root cause, everything is the proximal/proximate cause, or the point at which we can make the most “economic” impact
82% of first impressions are based on warmth and competence. This means that if you can control how warm and competent you appear, you’re already taking care of the majority of the impression you make.
Pain is inevitable, but suffering might be a choice. Scripture provides examples, such as Paul and Silas in Acts 16. Despite being beaten and imprisoned, they prayed and sang hymns, demonstrating that one’s response to pain need not be despair
In our modern society, suitable forums for difficult conversations are increasingly rare.
God has positioned you where you are to shine His light. Whether it’s a casual coffee chat or a deeper lunchtime discussion, you have countless opportunities to share the love of Jesus with your coworkers.
The secular world is not neutral. It actively disciples people, promoting values that directly contradict Scripture.
As followers of Christ, our responsibility is clear. We are not here to win arguments but to win people to the Kingdom of God. Yet we can never accomplish this by watering down the truth of God’s Word
When we declare that Jesus is the only way to salvation (John 14:6), or uphold biblical morality in a culture that celebrates sin, we’re bound to face resistance. Free speech gives us the right to proclaim God’s truth, but it doesn’t guarantee that people will welcome it.